Negotiation and Social Exchange between Principal and Agent
نویسندگان
چکیده
The principal-agent problem is fundamental to organization design. A principal must negotiate an incentive contract to motivate a more risk averse agent to undertake costly actions that cannot be observed. In rational choice theory, the problem is solved through an inefficient shifting of risk from principal to agent. However neither field studies nor prior experiments have observed the types of contracts nor the agent response predicted by this theory. Two experiments were conducted to test a modular social cognition theory explanation for this discrepancy. According to this alternative to rational choice theory, individuals have evolved specialized cognitive capabilities for dealing with exchange relations. These very human capabilities do not operate by the same logic as rational choice. Both a study of individual agent decisions to a series of hypothesized contracts in experiment one and the interactive bargaining of experiment two yielded results consistent with the modular theory. The logic of social exchange is quite different from the logic of individual choice or game theory. Implications for theory and practice are considered.
منابع مشابه
Improving Agent Performance for Multi-Resource Negotiation Using Learning Automata and Case-Based Reasoning
In electronic commerce markets, agents often should acquire multiple resources to fulfil a high-level task. In order to attain such resources they need to compete with each other. In multi-agent environments, in which competition is involved, negotiation would be an interaction between agents in order to reach an agreement on resource allocation and to be coordinated with each other. In recent ...
متن کاملLearning By Design Agents During Negotiation
POSITION PAPER As more and more design applications are conceived to be carried out by multi-agent systems, the designed artifact and the design process are both strongly influenced by interactions between agents. These interactions are the direct result of agent reasoning and agent decisions. Different types of knowledge are exchanged during the interactions and this produces various opportuni...
متن کاملNegotiation Content Ontology for Human-Agent Negotiation
Human-agent negotiation is very important and highly complex task in electronic business negotiation. A hybrid model has been proposed to enable e-negotiation between human and software agents. In this model a human interacts with an intelligent software agent through exchange of messages to reach on an agreement. In this paper, we present a content level ontology by conceptualizing nine types ...
متن کاملArgumentation and Artifacts for Negotiation Support
Negotiation is a central process in an agent society where autonomous agents have to cooperate in order to resolve conflicting interests and yet compete to divide limited resources. A direct dialogical exchange of information between agents usually leads to competitive forms of negotiation where the most powerful agents win. Alternatively, an intelligent mediated interaction may better achieve ...
متن کاملOpportunities for Learning in Multi-Agent Meeting Scheduling
In this paper we explore opportunities for learning in Multi-Agent Meeting Scheduling. We view this multiagent task as fully distributed with several challenging characteristics: (i) agents have ownership of their own calendars; (ii) agents exchange information among each other with the goal of finding an open meeting time; (iii) agents can negotiate multiple meetings concurrently. We have impl...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2004